Thursday, November 20, 2008

The Booker, eh?

Chetan Bhagat must wonder why any of his novels – Five Point Someone and the other two, whatever their name was - haven’t won the Booker yet. For if a heavily clichéd take on modern Indian civilization by a first-time amateurish writer can bag the prize, surely Mr. Bhagat deserves it too. His efforts if not purely authentic, were at least not cynical or judgemental in any way. At least, they made for good time pass.

Aravind Adiga’s The White Tiger leaves you with no such hope. The plot itself is one that’s bound to make you roll your eyes. The protagonist, a sweet-seller-turned-driver, son of a rickshaw puller, recounts the story of his rise to entrepreneurial success to none less than the Chinese Premier, letting him see and making him familiar with the face of the ‘true’ India in the process. Sounds quite exciting, doesn’t it? Yes, that’s the bait.

What follows is one cliché piled upon another. Almost every page in this book contains some witty remark by the author; you haven’t yet got over the last fantastic conclusive comment when you encounter the next. Very early in the novel, the narrator, Balram (the protagonist himself) divides India into two parts – Light and Darkness. According to him (and this theory takes some gulping down), all the places in the country which lie on the banks of the Ganges (called the ‘black river’ by him) fall in the Darkness. All other places fall in the Light. The Darkness, as its name unmistakably suggests, is an area of utter desolation, where rich and oppressive landlords rule over the poor working class, where no one is ever pleased with his life and hopes to, someday, move to the big cities of Delhi or Bombay i.e. the Light. This ambitious demarcation is not just mentioned cursorily; it is repeated throughout the novel; for example, a fellow member of the working class from Bihar is described as ‘belonging to the Darkness’.

Firstly, what the author fails to realize is that the area he has called the ‘Darkness’, which includes states like U.P., Bihar and Bengal have produced some of the greatest minds of the country. For decades before and after independence, this area has often been the centre of Indian thought. To call it by this preposterous title is nothing but a travesty. Secondly, they might not be in the fittest condition at present, but not all is dark there really. Yes, many people in most of these parts do aspire to move to the bigger cities in search for a better life, but that is only because of the pressures of globalization, the advantages of which haven’t yet reached them in its entirety. Nevertheless, like everywhere else, most of the people do manage to live a content life, and not everyone is as close to destitution and total dissatisfaction as Adiga paints them to be. In his world, every man in these parts is a bitter man, frustrated yet subdued by an overbearing social system, where nothing happens except daughter-in-laws being killed for dowry or husbands being milked for money, treated worse than animals by their wives.

Everything reminds you of some early 90’s melodramatic extravaganza. The villains are the politicians and the landlords, conspiring to keep the poor beneath their feet, adept at murder, rape, bribe-taking and all other possible crimes. When the rich appear, they do like over-savvy maniacs, who are obsessed with wearing designer clothes, going to the malls every second day, who love sending SMSs to their friends in the U.S.A. Generalization upon generalization, so much that it makes you wonder whether all the talk about India’s multi-faceted personality, its diversity, its dynamics is but a myth, whether in reality everything here can be painted in the twin shades of black and white.

But unlike the films, the poor are not really good people either – deeply wounded by being treated like animals, they themselves have become animal-like – excessively bitter, revengeful and ready to play along. They curse the rich behind their backs, leave no chance of pinching money from them, even conspire to murder them. In Adiga’s world, everyone is a negative character, with no scope for human dignity, pity or kindness. You have it in writing here. India is a living hell and all its inhabitants are monsters.

Every great novel, however morose or melancholic, treats its characters and the world around with compassion. Be it Rushdie’s Bombay, Naipaul’s Trinidad or Bellow’s Chicago, even the worst of men in these great cities are portrayed as human beings capable of thought and feeling. And even when the world around is in tatters, there is always the glimmer of hope, the anticipation that things can be set right, that life, however ghastly it may seem at the moment, is better than death. This is where Adiga fails completely. In this novel, which is in the form of a letter, the protagonist finds nothing remotely good about the country to say to the Chinese Premier, nothing that could point towards a possible solution, of a way out of the mess he has taken so much pain to elaborate on.

Adiga gets the Booker. And perhaps it is not that surprising that he did. For to the ignorant foreigner eager to know about India, this book can be very easily assimilated. It doesn’t even attempt to get into the complexities of the new India, the whys and hows, and the foreigner, who has never seen the ‘Light’ or the ‘Darkness’ with his own eyes will take the author’s word for it. A friend told me that Sea of Poppies by Amitav Ghosh is believed to be selling more copies in India than this more recent award-winning novel. And that too is not surprising. For the Indians of the ‘true’ India know better.

10 comments:

Unknown said...

Earlier I thought of buying his second(in fact first because he couldn't find any publisher) book 'Between the Assassinations' but after reading 'the white tiger' I drop that idea.
All he can see in modern india is garbage,pimps and prostitutes, faecal matter,pollution,slums, corruption, overflowing drainage with human excreta.
It seems he wants to impress the panel by writing all the ills about india and it seems he has succeeded in his mission. Earlier he was TIME correspondent from Delhi and this magazine is famous for showing dark sides of india and i guess he knows much better how to strike the right chord among the foreigners. He is a true anglo-phile, which he should be ashamed off.
The problem is not that he has criticized about india but the real problem is that all he said are half truths.

Zinque said...

The book must be pretty sad to have received such brutality from someone who was really excited about it.. Piper, your time has come.. now u must write about the true india in the true way, and with your truly fabulous flair you could truly win the next booker. and deserve it ;)

Chandni said...

Its the season of ridiculous books I think. I was thinking of reading thi one on an upcoming train journey. But after suffering through this shit called Bombay Girls Bombay Rains, I don't think I can take any more bad literature on India.

The review was, in the kindest terms, brutal. Thanks for the warning.

Marvin said...

Must be providence. Or perhaps something else. I went to buy the book just after it won the Booker. The guy tells me it's out of stock. So I end up buying two other ones. One turns out to be crap fiction about campus life. Other remains unread.

Coming to the post, or what it discusses, I should thank you for stalling me from buying the book. At least that's what I can say after this review.

Other things, in case the portrayal shifts between black and white, without dwelling upon the greys, then it must be severely biased. For no place, however degraded, can afford to be such. Not at all India. I can understand if the bad is more than the good. But the balance is definitely not tilted one way.

But I must consult other reviewers too. You have been known to be biased in favour of Biharis.

Piper said...

Vineet: Half-truth is the best way to describe it, yes.

Zinque: I'll drink to that. Heh. But the Booker has partly lost its charm for me now. I'm going straight for the Nobel in Literature!

Chandni: Frankly, the title 'Bombay Girls, Bombay Rains' should have been enough to put you off.

But believe me, life's sad when a Booker disappoints you. Seriously.

Marvin: This is crazy. My dear old man, it's not about Biharis! That was just an example. I couldn't possibly put here all the amazing revelations this book has come up with, could I?

You're free to seek a second opinion on this. And do let me know if they have something else to say. Pakke se.

To all: Though I've already done it, it wasn't my intention to dissuade you people from reading this book. Give it a try. Perhaps, only to feel disgusted. Or, even better - it might make more sense to you than it did to me. Who knows?

Sashu... said...

I had picked up WHITE TIGER anticipating a great read! but least to say i was thoroughly disappointed. I managed to read the book just for the sake of reading it. A sheer disappointment is what this BOOKER winner is to me...!

i completely agree with your review :)

Chandni said...

Blame the sudden urge to read some trash coupled with very little time on my hands I guess.

A booker which I loved was Life of Pi. Recommended Reading.

ps: on second thoughts, no excuses for picking up the bombay book :P

Marvin said...

I forgot to put this smiley after the last line in my comment -> :P

But it is a known fact that you have a weakness for Bihar. Come on now!

:)

Anonymous said...

hey guys

about all the garbage,pimps and prostitutes, faecal matter,pollution,slums, corruption, overflowing drainage with human excreta that is seen in the book. I bought one of the 1st copies of this book and I bought it because of the fact it said that unlike most of the books about india which show colours, this book is a completely bald, angry, unadorned portrait of the country from the bottom of the heap.
And rightly so, it had all that. but yes a bit too much of that. And Bihar and UP might have produced some of the best minds but surely the situation in these states is not the same anymore. So, as far as i understand lot of things put in the book are true for these places and situations (not really as filmy).
As for the book, I didn't really find it as interesting and engrossing and was really amazed that it won the bookers. I guess surely because this was a new view for the 'angrez' (not for us though).
And for me one line that griped me was "Before independence we lived in a zoo, and after it we live in a jungle". Very true.

Go through the book once, if you find it with some one, don't invest in it.

Piper said...

spicycartoon:

There is something that lies between the 'India with colours' and the 'completely bald, angry, unordained portrait' of it. And that is what essentially constitutes good literature on this country, Naipaul's trilogy on India or Suketu Mehta's Maximum City being a couple of examples. Describing things in binary, like Adiga does, works only in a very few cases.

And Bihar and UP? I can understand that corruption, backwardness and crime are rampant there today, but the way Adiga has described the personal lives of people is infuriating. Remember his description of migrant workers returning home from the big cities? Or how Kusum is described throughout the book? Being a person who's spent a substantial amount of time in those parts, I can tell you that the people there, whatever they are, are not animals. Adiga seems to know next to nothing about their reality, about their sorrow and despair. It's the lack of compassion that he shows for these people is what completely puts you off.

You are right when you say that it's written for the foreigner. And he's almost shamelessly selling it to them. I quote Adiga here, after he was longlisted for the Booker - "It’s a great thrill to be longlisted for the Booker. Especially alongside Amitav Ghosh and Salman Rushdie. But I live in Mumbai, where not many people know of the Man Booker Prize; I’m still standing in long queues and standing in over-packed local trains in the morning and worrying about falling ill from unsafe drinking water. Life goes on as before." For him, its bad bad bad. All the way.